Web Design at What Price?

The internet has become one of the most commonly used tools when we want to find out some information, be it on a local issue or of national concern. Companies who provide web design services to major companies and smaller clients alike can charge anything from a couple of thousand pounds to tens of thousands for a more complex website, but at what cost should we say enough is enough? This issue has been raised recently as the Norfolk Police spent a staggering £250,000 on having their website redesigned.

Even web design insiders have been flabbergasted at this amount, stating that the work which has gone into the site could o way warrant for such a high bill unless they were being seriously over charged. £100,000, whilst still a massive amount, is a closer figure to what the web design agency london should have cost, however there are digital agencies who would have been able to provide quality service and great design for a fraction of that cost.

Investigations into the company who provided Norfolk Police with their new website have revealed no definitive answer, though it is believed that a London-based design agency was responsible as they list the police constabulary as one of their clients. The design company cannot be named for legal reasons. This company charged a massive £254,662.08 for the re-design, however local digital agencies in Norfolk had given the police estimates ranging from £10,000 to £100,000, half the price of the final cost.

This begs the question, when it comes to web design, are you better to choose a nation or city based company or a local digital agency?

Web design York based companies have proven to be very successful, racking up awards for the websites that they have designed and launched for their clients. They are also committed to developing their websites and keeping up to date with new technologies and advancements in the field. Other towns such as Harrogate and the cities of Yorkshire including Bradford and Leeds also have a great reputation of playing home to successful web design companies.

However, big city firms have received less positive press in the past for their web design work. Many clients have reported that they were neglected if a bigger client came on board. With so much emphasis on figures and targets among the sales team, clients are taken on board with no possibility of the designers being able to stick to launch dates, and communication from the client to the designer is diluted through several people.

If Technology Is Effective in the Classroom – Why Do Some Students Dislike It So Much?

The viability of innovation use in the study hall has turned into a dubious issue. While numerous instructors and understudies feel that it’s ideal to utilize innovation since it improves encouraging numerous others feel that it causes such a large number of difficulties and that it is an exercise in futility. On the off chance that innovation is as successful in the study hall the same number of instructors trust it to be; the reason do a few understudies hate it to such an extent?


So as to unbiasedly react to this inquiry, 3 articles were inspected. 2 out of the 3 relate how the utilization of innovation in the study hall disappoints understudies while the last one deciphers the contemplations of understudies who feel that innovation in the study hall has reacted to their need. So the issue isn’t that innovation isn’t compelling yet rather that a few educators should be careful about innovation use in the homeroom and others should be prepared so as to appropriately utilize innovation to instruct with the goal that understudies don’t see innovation as check adapting yet as an upgrading device.

In the wake of condensing the 3 articles that have been looked into we will have the option to demonstrate that there are 2 gatherings of understudies who guarantee to disdain innovation in the homeroom: Those who are inappropriately presented to it by their instructor and the individuals who didn’t give themselves sufficient opportunity to acquaint themselves with it. We will at that point have the option to get to the obvious end result that those equivalent understudies would welcome the estimation of innovation in the study hall if their instructors utilized it appropriately. Give us initial a chance to outline the articles that we are alluding to.


The article “When great innovation implies terrible instructing related that numerous understudies feel that instructors and teacher use innovation as an approach to flaunt. Understudies gripe of innovation making their instructors “less viable than they would be in the event that they adhered to a talk at the writing slate” (Young) different issues related by understudies incorporate educators burning through class time to instruct about a web device or to fat with a projector or programming. At the point when instructors are new to the mechanical apparatuses, they are probably going to abdomen additional time attempting to utilize them the innovative programming that is utilized the most as per understudies is PowerPoint. Understudies whine that instructors use it rather than their exercise plan. Numerous understudies clarify that it makes seeing increasingly troublesome “I call it PowerPoint misuse” (Young). Teachers likewise present their PowerPoint Presentation on the educational committee when class and this urges understudies to miss more classes.


Another issue detailed in the article with the utilization of innovation in the study halls is that numerous schools invest energy to prepare their staff about how to utilize a specific innovation yet it doesn’t prepare them on “systems to utilize them well” (Young). The author accepted that schools ought to likewise give little fiscal motivating forces to educators and teachers to go to workshops.